Tuesday, January 24, 2012

CIVIL CONSTRUCTION PROJECT COST CONTROL BASIC AND TUTORIALS

CIVIL CONSTRUCTION PROJECT COST CONTROL BASIC INFORMATION
How To Control  Civil Construction Project Cost?


It is during the design stage that measures to keep the cost of a project within a budget figure are most effective. All possible savings in design need to be sought, not only because this is manifestly in the interests of the employer, but because there are sure to be some unforeseen extra costs that need to be offset by any savings that can be made.

Alternative designs of layout or of parts of the works have often to be studied before the most economic solution is found; hence completion of all design before starting construction makes a major contribution to controlling project cost.

The most prolific causes of extra cost are:

• not completing the design of the works in all essentials before the contract for construction is let;
• not allowing adequate site investigations to take place;
• encountering unforeseen conditions;
• making changes to the works during construction.

The first two listed above can be avoided by taking the appropriate measures. The third, however, is not avoidable even if the site investigations have been as reasonably extensive as an experienced engineer would recommend.

The last – changes during construction – can be minimized by ensuring designs are complete before construction commences, and that the employer takes time to assure himself that the works as designed are what he wants. But some changes are unavoidable if, during construction, the employer finds changed economic conditions, new requirements or more up-to-date plant, or new legislation forces him to make a change.

The designer should keep aware of possible changes to the employer’s needs and other technical developments, and not so design the works that possible additions or alterations are precluded or made unacceptably expensive.

If tenders are received which exceed the budget estimate by so large a sum that the employer cannot accept any tender, means of reducing the cost may have to be sought. Generally speaking, down-sizing a part or the whole of the works is usually not as successful in reducing costs as omitting a part of the works.

Reducing the output of some works or the size of a structure by 25 per cent, for instance, seldom results in more than 10 per cent saving in cost, and can make restoration at a later date to the full output or size an expensive and uneconomic proposition.

If the employer can find some part of the works which can be omitted, this is a more secure way of reducing the cost of a project, and it should be possible to negotiate such an omission with the preferred tenderer.

SCREW CAST IN DISPLACEMENT PILES BASIC AND TUTORIALS

SCREW CAST IN DISPLACEMENT PILES BASIC INFORMATION
What Are And How To Install Screw Cast In Displacement Piles?


Whilst the installation of this type of pile is effected by means of a type of auger, the process involves compaction rather than removal of the soil and, in this respect; the piles are of a displacement type. In forming the pile, a heavy-duty single-start auger head with a short flight is screwed into the ground to the required depth.

The auger head is carried on a hollow stem which transmits the considerable torque and compressive forces required, and through which the reinforcement cage is inserted after completion of the installation process. The end of the hollow stem is sealed with a disposable tip.

Following placement of the reinforcement, concrete is placed through this tube from a hopper at its head. As concrete filling takes place, the auger is unscrewed and removed, leaving behind a screw-threaded cast-in-place pile.

By virtue of the combined rotation and controlled lifting applied at the extraction stage the ‘threads’ are of robust dimensions. The sequence of pile construction is shown in Figure 3.6.


This method of forming a pile is known as the Atlas Piling System, and is marketed by Cementation Foundations: Skanska Limited in the United Kingdom, in association with N.V. Franki S.A of Belgium. A purpose-designed, track-mounted rig provides hydraulic power for auger rotation and the application of downward force and is fitted with a crane boom for handling reinforcement and concrete skips.

For a given pile size and volume of concrete, pile capacities are greater than for traditionally constructed bored piles, although the restricted diameter of the reinforcement cage may be a disadvantage if the pile is required to resist high bending stresses. The system does however combine many of the advantages of a displacement pile with the low noise and vibration characteristics of a bored pile.

It will operate in most cohesive and granular strata to a maximum depth of 22 m, providing piles ranging in diameter from 360 to 560 mm. To achieve the torque of perhaps 250 to 350kNm required at the auger, power requirements are relatively high.

CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT - Case study: Stoke-on-Trent Schools, UK

In 1997 many of the schools in Stoke-on-Trent were in a dilapidated state and not fit for modern teaching and learning practice. The school...