STRUCTURAL STEELS THERMAL CUTTING EFFECTS BASIC INFORMATION
What Are The Thermal Cutting Effects On Structural Steel?
Fabrication of steel structures usually requires cutting of components by thermal cutting processes such as oxyfuel, air carbon arc, and plasma arc. Thermal cutting processes liberate a large quantity of heat in the kerf, which heats the newly generated cut surfaces to very high temperatures.
As the cutting torch moves away, the surrounding metal cools the cut surfaces rapidly and causes the formation of a heat-affected zone analogous to that of a weld. The depth of the heat-affected zone depends on the carbon and alloy content of the steel, the thickness of the piece, the preheat temperature, the cutting speed, and the postheat treatment.
In addition to the microstructural changes that occur in the heat-affected zone, the cut surface may exhibit a slightly higher carbon content than material below the surface. The detrimental properties of the thin layer can be improved significantly by using proper preheat, or postheat, or decreasing cutting speed, or any combination thereof.
The hardness of the thermally cut surface is the most important variable influencing the quality of the surface as measured by a bend test. Plate chemistry (carbon content), Charpy V-notch toughness, cutting speed, and plate temperature are also important.
Preheating the steel prior to cutting, and decreasing the cutting speed, reduce the temperature gradients induced by the cutting operation, thereby serving to (1) decrease the migration of carbon to the cut surface, (2) decrease the hardness of the cut surface, (3) reduce distortion, (4) reduce or give more favorable distribution to the thermally induced stresses, and (5) prevent the formation of quench or cooling cracks.
The need for preheating increases with increased carbon and alloy content of the steel, with increased thickness of the steel, and for cuts having geometries that act as high stress raisers. Most recommendations for minimum preheat temperatures are similar to those for welding.
The roughness of thermally cut surfaces is governed by many factors such as (1) uniformity of the preheat, (2) uniformity of the cutting velocity (speed and direction), and (3) quality of the steel. The larger the nonuniformity of these factors, the larger is the roughness of the cut surface.
The roughness of a surface is important because notches and stress raisers can lead to fracture. The acceptable roughness for thermally cut surfaces is governed by the job requirements and by the magnitude and fluctuation of the stresses for the particular component and the geometrical detail within the component.
In general, the surface roughness requirements for bridge components are more stringent than for buildings. The desired magnitude and uniformity of surface roughness can be achieved best by using automated thermal cutting equipment where cutting speed and direction are easily controlled.
Manual procedures tend to produce a greater surface roughness that may be unacceptable for primary tension components. This is attributed to the difficulty in controlling both the cutting speed and the small transverse perturbations from the cutting direction.
(R. L. Brockenbrough and J. M. Barsom, Metallurgy, Chapter 1.1 in Constructional Steel Design—An International Guide, R. Bjorhovde et al, Eds., Elsevier Science Publishers, Ltd., New York.)
CIVIL ENGINEERING DESIGN | CIVIL ENGINEERING DEGREE RESOURCES | CIVIL ENGINEERING DESIGN | CIVIL ENGINEERING TUTORIALS | STRUCTURAL DESIGN | CONSTRUCTION | TUTORIALS ON STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING | CONCRETE DESIGN | TIMBER DESIGN | STEEL DESIGN | BRIDGE ENGINEERING | ENVIRONMENTAL | HYDRAULICS | MATERIALS
Friday, February 3, 2012
Thursday, February 2, 2012
RELATIVE COST OF STRUCTURAL STEEL BASICS AND TUTORIALS
RELATIVE COST OF STRUCTURAL STEEL BASIC INFORMATION
How To Compute Relative Cost Of Structural Steel?
Because of the many strength levels and grades now available, designers usually must investigate several steels to determine the most economical one for each application. As a guide, relative material costs of several structural steels used as tension members, beams, and columns are discussed below.
The comparisons are based on cost of steel to fabricators (steel producer’s price) because, in most applications, cost of a steel design is closely related to material costs. However, the total fabricated and erected cost of the structure should be considered in a final cost analysis.
Thus the relationships shown should be considered as only a general guide.
Tension Members. Assume that two tension members of different-strength steels have the same length. Then, their material-cost ratio C2 /C1 is
C2/C1 = A2P2/A1P1
where A1 and A2 are the cross-sectional areas and p1 and p2 are the material prices per unit weight. If the members are designed to carry the same load at a stress that is a fixed percentage of the yield point, the cross-sectional areas are inversely proportional to the yield stresses. Therefore, their relative material cost can be expressed as
C2/C1 = Fy1p2/Fy2p1 (1.2)
where Fy1 and Fy2 are the yield stresses of the two steels. The ratio p2 /p1 is the relative price factor. Values of this factor for several steels are given in Table 1.4, with A36 steel as the base.
The table indicates that the relative price factor is always less than the corresponding yield-stress ratio. Thus the relative cost of tension members calculated from Eq. (1.2) favors the use of high-strength steels.
How To Compute Relative Cost Of Structural Steel?
Because of the many strength levels and grades now available, designers usually must investigate several steels to determine the most economical one for each application. As a guide, relative material costs of several structural steels used as tension members, beams, and columns are discussed below.
The comparisons are based on cost of steel to fabricators (steel producer’s price) because, in most applications, cost of a steel design is closely related to material costs. However, the total fabricated and erected cost of the structure should be considered in a final cost analysis.
Thus the relationships shown should be considered as only a general guide.
Tension Members. Assume that two tension members of different-strength steels have the same length. Then, their material-cost ratio C2 /C1 is
C2/C1 = A2P2/A1P1
where A1 and A2 are the cross-sectional areas and p1 and p2 are the material prices per unit weight. If the members are designed to carry the same load at a stress that is a fixed percentage of the yield point, the cross-sectional areas are inversely proportional to the yield stresses. Therefore, their relative material cost can be expressed as
C2/C1 = Fy1p2/Fy2p1 (1.2)
where Fy1 and Fy2 are the yield stresses of the two steels. The ratio p2 /p1 is the relative price factor. Values of this factor for several steels are given in Table 1.4, with A36 steel as the base.
The table indicates that the relative price factor is always less than the corresponding yield-stress ratio. Thus the relative cost of tension members calculated from Eq. (1.2) favors the use of high-strength steels.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT - Case study: Stoke-on-Trent Schools, UK
In 1997 many of the schools in Stoke-on-Trent were in a dilapidated state and not fit for modern teaching and learning practice. The school...
