BRITTLE FRACTURES OF STEEL STRUCTURES UNDER IMPACT LOAD BASIC INFORMATION
What Are Brittle Fractures Of Steel Structures?
Structural steel does not always exhibit a ductile behaviour, and under some circumstances a sudden and catastrophic fracture may occur, even though the nominal tensile stresses are low. Brittle fracture is initiated by the existence or formation of a small crack in a region of high local stress.
Once initiated, the crack may propagate in a ductile (or stable) fashion for which the external forces must supply the energy required to tear the steel. More serious are cracks which propagate at high speed in a brittle (or unstable) fashion, for which some of the internal elastic strain energy stored in steel is released and used to fracture the steel.
Such a crack is self-propagating while there is sufficient internal strain energy, and will continue until arrested by ductile elements in its path which have sufficient deformation capacity to absorb the internal energy released.
The resistance of a structure to brittle fracture depends on the magnitude of local stress concentrations, on the ductility of the steel, and on the three-dimensional geometrical constraints. High local stresses facilitate crack initiation, and so stress concentrations due to poor geometry and loading arrangements (including impact loading) are dangerous.
Also of great importance are flaws and defects in the material, which not only increase the local stresses, but also provide potential sites for crack initiation.
The ductility of a structural steel depends on its composition, heat treatment, and thickness, and varies with temperature and strain rate. Figure 1.11 shows the increase with temperature of the capacity of the steel to absorb energy during impact.
At low temperatures the energy absorption is low and initiation and propagation of brittle fractures are comparatively easy, while at high temperatures the energy absorption is high because of ductile yielding, and the propagation of cracks can be arrested.
Between these two extremes is a transitional range in which crack initiation becomes increasingly difficult. The likelihood of brittle fracture is also increased by high strain rates due to dynamic loading, since the consequent increase in the yield stress reduces the possibility of energy absorption by ductile yielding.
The chemical composition of steel has a marked influence on its ductility: brittleness is increased by the presence of excessive amounts of most non-metallic elements, while ductility is increased by the presence of some metallic elements.
Steel with large grain size tends to be more brittle, and this is significantly influenced by heat treatment of the steel, and by its thickness (the grain size tends to be larger in thicker sections). EC3-1-10 [18] provides values of the maximum thickness t1 for different steel grades and minimum service temperatures, as well as advice on using a more advanced fracture mechanics [34] based approach and guidance on safeguarding against lamellar tearing.
Three-dimensional geometrical constraints, such as those occurring in thicker or more massive elements, also encourage brittleness, because of the higher local stresses, and because of the greater release of energy during cracking and the consequent increase in the ease of propagation of the crack.
The risk of brittle fracture can be reduced by selecting steel types which have ductilities appropriate to the service temperatures, and by designing joints with a view to minimising stress concentrations and geometrical constraints.
Fabrication techniques should be such that they will avoid introducing potentially dangerous flaws or defects. Critical details in important structures may be subjected to inspection procedures aimed at detecting significant flaws.
Of course the designer must give proper consideration to the extra cost of special steels, fabrication techniques, and inspection and correction procedures.
CIVIL ENGINEERING DESIGN | CIVIL ENGINEERING DEGREE RESOURCES | CIVIL ENGINEERING DESIGN | CIVIL ENGINEERING TUTORIALS | STRUCTURAL DESIGN | CONSTRUCTION | TUTORIALS ON STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING | CONCRETE DESIGN | TIMBER DESIGN | STEEL DESIGN | BRIDGE ENGINEERING | ENVIRONMENTAL | HYDRAULICS | MATERIALS
Wednesday, February 8, 2012
TYPES OF WOOD BUILDING FRAMING SYSTEMS BASIC AND TUTORIALS
BUILDING FRAME SYSTEM THAT USES WOOD BASIC INFORMATION
What Are The Different Building Framing System Using Wood?
There are various types of framing systems that can be used in wood buildings. The most common type of wood-frame construction uses a system of horizontal diaphragms and vertical shearwalls to resist lateral forces, and specifically with the design of this basic type of building.
At one time building codes classified a shearwall building as a box system, which was a good physical description of the way in which the structure resists lateral forces. However, building codes have dropped this terminology, and most wood-frame shearwall buildings are now classified as bearing wall systems.
It is felt that the designer should first have a firm understanding of the behavior of basic shearwall buildings and the design procedures that are applied to them. With a background of this nature, the designer can acquire from currently available sources the design techniques for other systems.
The basic bearing wall system can be constructed entirely from wood components. See Fig. 1.1. Here the roof, floors, and walls use wood framing.
In addition to buildings that use only wood components, other common types of construction make use of wood components in combination with some other type or types of structural material. Perhaps the most common mix of structural materials is in buildings that use wood roof and floor systems and concrete tiltup or masonry (concrete block or brick) shearwalls.
See Fig. 1.2. This type of construction is common, especially in one-story commercial and industrial buildings. This construction is economical for small buildings, but its economy improves as the size of the building increases.
Trained crews can erect large areas of panelized roof systems in short periods of time. See Fig. 1.3.
Design procedures for the wood components used in buildings with concrete or masonry walls are also illustrated throughout this book. The connections between wood and concrete or masonry elements are particularly important and are treated in considerable detail.
Wind and seismic (earthquake) are the two lateral forces that are normally taken into account in the design of a building. In recent years, design for lateral forces has become a significant portion of the design effort.
The reason for this is an increased awareness of the effects of lateral forces. In addition, the building codes have substantially revised the design requirements for both wind and seismic forces. These changes are the result of extensive research in wind engineering and earthquake-resistant design.
What Are The Different Building Framing System Using Wood?
There are various types of framing systems that can be used in wood buildings. The most common type of wood-frame construction uses a system of horizontal diaphragms and vertical shearwalls to resist lateral forces, and specifically with the design of this basic type of building.
At one time building codes classified a shearwall building as a box system, which was a good physical description of the way in which the structure resists lateral forces. However, building codes have dropped this terminology, and most wood-frame shearwall buildings are now classified as bearing wall systems.
It is felt that the designer should first have a firm understanding of the behavior of basic shearwall buildings and the design procedures that are applied to them. With a background of this nature, the designer can acquire from currently available sources the design techniques for other systems.
The basic bearing wall system can be constructed entirely from wood components. See Fig. 1.1. Here the roof, floors, and walls use wood framing.
In addition to buildings that use only wood components, other common types of construction make use of wood components in combination with some other type or types of structural material. Perhaps the most common mix of structural materials is in buildings that use wood roof and floor systems and concrete tiltup or masonry (concrete block or brick) shearwalls.
See Fig. 1.2. This type of construction is common, especially in one-story commercial and industrial buildings. This construction is economical for small buildings, but its economy improves as the size of the building increases.
Trained crews can erect large areas of panelized roof systems in short periods of time. See Fig. 1.3.
Design procedures for the wood components used in buildings with concrete or masonry walls are also illustrated throughout this book. The connections between wood and concrete or masonry elements are particularly important and are treated in considerable detail.
Wind and seismic (earthquake) are the two lateral forces that are normally taken into account in the design of a building. In recent years, design for lateral forces has become a significant portion of the design effort.
The reason for this is an increased awareness of the effects of lateral forces. In addition, the building codes have substantially revised the design requirements for both wind and seismic forces. These changes are the result of extensive research in wind engineering and earthquake-resistant design.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT - Case study: Stoke-on-Trent Schools, UK
In 1997 many of the schools in Stoke-on-Trent were in a dilapidated state and not fit for modern teaching and learning practice. The school...



