Calculation Procedure:
1. Evaluate the results obtained with
different forms of tendons The capacity of a given member is
increased by using deflected rather than straight tendons, and the
capacity is maximized by using parabolic tendons. (However, in the
case of a pretensioned beam, an economy analysis must also take into
account the expense incurred in deflecting the tendons.)
2. Evaluate the prestressing force For
a given ratio of yj/ye the prestressing force that is required to
maximize the capacity of a member is a function of the
cross-sectional area and the allowable stresses. It is independent of
the form of the trajectory.
3. Determine the effect of section
moduli If the section moduli are in excess of the minimum required,
the prestressing force is minimized by setting the critical values
offbf and/, equal to their respective allowable values.
4. Determine the most economical
short-span section For a short-span member, an I section is most
economical because it yields the required section moduli with the
minimum area. Moreover, since the required values of Sb and St
differ, the area should be disposed unsymmetrically about middepth to
secure these values.
5. Consider the calculated value of e
Since an increase in span causes a greater increase in the
theoretical eccentricity than in the depth, the calculated value of e
is not attainable in a long-span member because the centroid of the
tendons would fall beyond the confines of the section. For this
reason, long-span members are generally constructed as T sections.
The extensive flange area elevates the centroidal axis, thus making
it possible to secure a reasonably large eccentricity.
6. Evaluate the effect of overload
A relatively small overload induces a
disproportionately large increase in the tensile stress in the beam
and thus introduces the danger of cracking. Moreover, owing to the
presence of many variable quantities, there is not a set relationship
between the beam capacity at allowable final stress and the capacity
at incipient cracking. It is therefore imperative that every
prestressed-concrete beam be subjected to an ultimate-strength
analysis to ensure that the beam provides an adequate factor of
safety.